The full (paid) version of GoPro-Cineform Neo (as I have) does support alpha channels.
(A colleague initially thought otherwise – but that impression turned out to be based on info from old forum threads)
The full (paid) version of GoPro-Cineform Neo (as I have) does support alpha channels.
(A colleague initially thought otherwise – but that impression turned out to be based on info from old forum threads)
Shooting green-screen onto a 4:2:0 chroma-subsampled format, intending of course to use it for chroma-keying. Obvious disadvantage is green-ness of green-screen only gets sampled at quarter-resolution. Not a show-stopper, given my target deliverable is standard definition, but anyhow, towards perfectionism, is there any way to up-sample to 4:4:4 i.e. full definition colour?
It does occur to me that something more sophisticated than chroma blur ought to be possible, broadly along the lines of edge-following methods employed in resizing. What’s out there?
Some tools that “promise” upsampling, but I wonder by what methods:
Some questions:
I don’t work in or for a newsroom as such, but I do cover live events.
As a child I watched in awe the live Apollo moon-missions. No single thing gave me more admiration for the USA than this, and I was not alone. Desolate decades followed, of introverted application of far greater sums of money and amounts of energy on transient and unimpressive efforts, on earth and in low earth orbit, the potential just evaporating into nothingness. Cynicism and opportunism of the new age questioned even that the moon missions had ever happened. Not that hard to appreciate, given that nothing in space on such a brave and imaginative human scale had happened since. Great robots and probes, but…
The practical possibility of exploratory missions to Mars was demonstrated decades ago. Yet nothing happened. The obstacle: neither technical nor financial, just establishment politics, inertia, entrenchment, fear. Now, with the success of the “unlikely” technology of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) (“Curiosity”) landing, something has re-awoken.
It is time to recognise, remember and reiterate the potential. Hopefully I’m contributing at least a tiny element to that spirit here, in my lowly video-technology blog.
This is the hope: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDWvsdEYSqg
How, on a Mac OS system, to do the equivalent of TREE in DOS:
http://murphymac.com/tree-command-for-mac/
My crude adaption of it, to list only the main directories in my [Media] area:
Last night the thought came, if only I could justify getting a Sony F3…
Now possibly the answer to my dreams? The forthcoming (next year, hopefully) KineRaw S35, by some people’s judgements, is broadly comparable to an Arri or RED but at half the price. That’s broadly not exactly. Yes, it’s from China.. I heard about it first from the highly informative NoFilmSchool (well worth joining).
This camera, nearing the end of its development and testing, shoots Raw (straight colours, no debayering), which to naive me sounds like big bandwidths and files, but as it happens, one of its options is to record to GoPro-Cineform RAW (10-bit log90) format. This, if I read the article by Jake Seagraves (as of 9 August 2012) correctly, for a 2K frame, has typically the same bandwidth as GoPro-Cineform HDV (1440×1080), namely/numerically around 15 MB/sec (=120Mb/s). I say typically because it is a Variable Bit Rate format, so obviously it depends on scene (including noise) complexity. By comparison, HDV 1440×1080 m2t (long-GOP Mpeg2), like DV, are about 25Mb/s. So Cineform is then about 5 times bigger than HDV and DV – the unavoidable cost of being “visually lossless”.
Some informative links I chanced upon:
Computer increasingly slow on start-up, eventually becomes sporadic in its ability to succeed, unexpected error messages…
Yes, it’s Disk Failure Time ! This time it was on my Mac Pro (desktop)
So I did these things: